Development of warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia after initiation of Ruxolitinib in a patient with STAT1 gain-of-function mutation

Introduction: STAT1 gain-of-function (GOF) disease is associated with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) and a broad spectrum of infectious, inflammatory, and vascular manifestations. The Janus Kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib has been used successfully for CMC and autoimmune phenomena. We describe a case of warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHA) in a patient with STAT1 GOF disease after initiating ruxolitinib. Case report: A 36-year-old man with STAT1 c.850G>A (p.Glu284Lys) mutation presented with CMC as well as recurrent viral and bacterial infections, lymphadenopathy, enteritis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) and splenomegaly. Immune workup confirmed a combined immunodeficiency with hypogammaglobulinemia and T-cell lymphopenia. Ruxolitinib was initiated at 5 mg twice daily (due to pre-existing thrombocytopenia) with up titration over 3 months to 20 mg twice daily. He improved with weight gain, increased energy, resolution of chronic anemia, and improved lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly on imaging. Serum CXCL9 only minimally decreased from 4660 pg/ml to 3990 pg/ml. Soon after reaching ruxolitinib 20 mg twice daily, he developed JC viremia, prompting dose reduction to 15 mg BID. Within two weeks, he developed a non-COVID upper respiratory tract infection followed by fatigue, shortness of breath with ambulation, and dark urine. Emergency evaluation revealed warm antibody positive hemolytic anemia with a hemoglobin of 5 g/dL, and worsened thrombocytopenia. He was treated with blood transfusions, pulse steroids, and high-dose IVIG with stabilization but continued hemolysis. Due to the JC viremia, there was concern to give rituximab with increased PML risk. Bone marrow showed trilineage hematopoiesis, a mild increase in megakaryocytes and RBC precursors, and a loss of B-cell progenitors with retention of mature B cells. His B and T lymphocyte numbers had increased since prior to ruxolitinib, with a predominance of Tfh1-cells (58.7% of total Tfh-cells). He was started on sirolimus with a slow taper of prednisone with continued stable hemoglobin and platelets, and resolution of hemolysis after 3 months. Conclusion(s): To our knowledge, this is the first case of a STAT1 GOF patient developing WAIHA while receiving ruxolitinib therapy. Treatment choices were complicated by the risks of PML. Sirolimus combined with ruxolitinib allowed wean of corticosteroid and subsequent resolution of hemolysis.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Serum proteomics hint at an early T-cell response and modulation of SARS-CoV-2-related pathogenic pathways in COVID-19-ARDS treated with Ruxolitinib.

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19) is triggered by hyperinflammation, thus providing a rationale for immunosuppressive treatments. The Janus kinase inhibitor Ruxolitinib (Ruxo) has shown efficacy in severe and critical COVID-19. In this study, we hypothesized that Ruxo's mode of action in this condition is reflected by changes in the peripheral blood proteome. Methods: This study included 11 COVID-19 patients, who were treated at our center's Intensive Care Unit (ICU). All patients received standard-of-care treatment and n = 8 patients with ARDS received Ruxo in addition. Blood samples were collected before (day 0) and on days 1, 6, and 10 of Ruxo treatment or, respectively, ICU admission. Serum proteomes were analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS) and cytometric bead array. Results: Linear modeling of MS data yielded 27 significantly differentially regulated proteins on day 1, 69 on day 6 and 72 on day 10. Only five factors (IGLV10-54, PSMB1, PGLYRP1, APOA5, WARS1) were regulated both concordantly and significantly over time. Overrepresentation analysis revealed biological processes involving T-cells only on day 1, while a humoral immune response and complement activation were detected at day 6 and day 10. Pathway enrichment analysis identified the NRF2-pathway early under Ruxo treatment and Network map of SARS-CoV-2 signaling and Statin inhibition of cholesterol production at later time points. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the mechanism of action of Ruxo in COVID-19-ARDS can be related to both known effects of this drug as a modulator of T-cells and the SARS-CoV-2-infection.

cGAS-STING PATHWAY LIMITS SARS-CoV-2 REPLICATION IN ACE2+ AIRWAY CELL LINES

Background: We previously screened 10 human lung and upper airway cell lines expressing variable levels of endogenous ACE2/TMPRSS2. We found that H522 human lung adenocarcinoma cells supported SARS-CoV-2 replication independent of ACE2, whereas the ACE2 positive cell lines were not permissive to infection. Type I/III interferons (IFNs) potently restrict SARS-CoV-2 replication through the actions of hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) that are upregulated upon IFN signaling. Here we report that a number of ACE2 positive airway cell lines are unable to support SARS-CoV-2 replication due to basal activation of the cGAS-STING DNA sensing pathway and subsequent upregulation of IFNs and ISGs which restrict SARS-CoV-2 replication. Method(s): SARS-CoV-2 WT strain 2019-nCoV/USA-WA1/2020 viral replication was detected through analysis of cell associated RNA. RNA sequencing was used to study the basal level of genes in the type-I IFN pathway in the 10 cell lines, which was further validated by western blotting and qRT-PCR. A panel of 5 cell lines, with varying expression levels of ACE2 and TMPRSS2, were pre-treated with Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor. A siRNA-mediated screen was used to determine the molecular basis of basally high expression of ISGs in cell lines. CRISPR knockout of IFN-alpha receptor and cGAS-STING pathway components was conducted in parallel Results: Here we show that higher basal levels of IFN pathway activity underlie the inability of ACE2+ cell lines to support virus replication. Importantly, this IFN-induced block can be overcome by chemical inhibition and genetic disruption of the IFN signaling pathway or by ACE2 overexpression, suggesting that one or more saturable ISGs underlie the lack of permissivity of these cells. Ruxolitinib treatment increased SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels by nearly 3 logs in OE21 and SCC25. Furthermore, the baseline activation of the STING-cGAS pathway accounts for the high ISG levels and genetic disruption of the cGAS-STING pathway enhances levels by nearly 2 and 3 logs of virus replication in the two separate ACE2+ cell line models respectively. Conclusion(s): Our findings demonstrate that cGAS-STING-dependent activation of IFN-mediated innate immunity underlies the inability of ACE2+ airway cell lines to support SARS-CoV-2 replication. Our study highlights that in addition to ACE2, basal activation of cGAS-STING pathway, IFNs and ISGs may play a key role in defining SARS-CoV-2 cellular tropism and may explain the complex SARS-CoV- 2 pathogenesis in vivo.

Fc RECEPTOR-MEDIATED INFECTION OF MYELOID CELLS BY SARS-CoV-2

Background: The role of myeloid cells in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 is well established, in particular as drivers of cytokine production and systemic inflammation characteristic of severe COVID-19. However, the potential for myeloid cells to act as bona fide targets of productive SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear. Method(s): Using anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs with a range of neutralisation potencies and binding specificities, we performed a detailed assessment of mAb-mediated infection of monocytes/macrophages. THP-1 cells were used as a model system, with results confirmed in primary macrophages. Result(s): Infection of THP-1 cells was seen via mAbs targeting the spike RBD, but not with those targeting the NTD or S2 subunit. mAbs with the most consistent potential to mediate infection targeted a conserved region of the RBD (group 1/class IV). No infection was seen with the same quantity of virus but in the absence of antibody, and pre-treating the cells with FcgammaRI and -II blocking antibodies inhibited infection. Thus, antibody-FcR interactions are able to expand the tropism of SARS-CoV-2. Time-course studies demonstrated high-level and productive infection. Studies performed in human iPSC-derived macrophages and primary monocyte-derived macrophages paralleled results seen in THP-1 cells but with lower infection levels. Up to 2% of macrophages were infected, with infected cells appearing multinucleated and syncytial. Addition of ruxolitinib, an inhibitor of JAK1/2 signalling, increased infection up to 10-fold, indicating limitation of infection through innate immune mechanisms. Sera from primary infections (n=80) mediated rare infection events, with a minority of samples (n=3) promoting significant infection. Competition assays confirmed results seen in sera, with the addition of neutralising mAbs diminishing the infection seen with infection-mediating mAbs. Thus, the presence of antibodies with potential to mediate infection is not sufficient to predict myeloid cell infection, rather, the context in which the antibodies are produced is key. Conclusion(s): We hypothesise that a nascent antibody response during peak viral replication in primary infection presents a window of opportunity for myeloid cells to become infected, while establishment of a robust polyclonal response via vaccination or prior infection reduces the likelihood of this occurring. Infection via antibody-FcR interactions could contribute to pathogenesis in primary infection, systemic virus spread or persistent infection.

Ruxolitinib as an Effective Treatment for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Secondary to SARS-Cov-2 Infection: A Case Report.

Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome. SARS-CoV-2 infection can induce secondary HLH, as described in previous case reports, but diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Case Study: We described an older male patient diagnosed with HLH related to previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fever was the only clinical manifestation initially but deterioration in clinical condition and laboratory parameters was observed during hospitalization. He responded poorly to classical therapy but was successfully treated with ruxolitinib. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of HLH secondary to mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and take timely therapeutic measures to inhibit an inflammatory factor storm. Ruxolitinib is a potential choice for COVID-19 related HLH.

Randomized phase II clinical trial of ruxolitinib plus simvastatin in COVID19 clinical outcome and cytokine evolution.

Background: Managing the inflammatory response to SARS-Cov-2 could prevent respiratory insufficiency. Cytokine profiles could identify cases at risk of severe disease. Methods: We designed a randomized phase II clinical trial to determine whether the combination of ruxolitinib (5 mg twice a day for 7 days followed by 10 mg BID for 7 days) plus simvastatin (40 mg once a day for 14 days), could reduce the incidence of respiratory insufficiency in COVID-19. 48 cytokines were correlated with clinical outcome. Participants: Patients admitted due to COVID-19 infection with mild disease. Results: Up to 92 were included. Mean age was 64 ± 17, and 28 (30%) were female. 11 (22%) patients in the control arm and 6 (12%) in the experimental arm reached an OSCI grade of 5 or higher (p = 0.29). Unsupervised analysis of cytokines detected two clusters (CL-1 and CL-2). CL-1 presented a higher risk of clinical deterioration vs CL-2 (13 [33%] vs 2 [6%] cases, p = 0.009) and death (5 [11%] vs 0 cases, p = 0.059). Supervised Machine Learning (ML) analysis led to a model that predicted patient deterioration 48h before occurrence with a 85% accuracy. Conclusions: Ruxolitinib plus simvastatin did not impact the outcome of COVID-19. Cytokine profiling identified patients at risk of severe COVID-19 and predicted clinical deterioration. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04348695.

The third dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines enhances the spike-specific antibody and memory B cell response in myelofibrosis patients.

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 using mRNA-based vaccines has been highly recommended for fragile subjects, including myelofibrosis patients (MF). Available data on the immune responsiveness of MF patients to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and the impact of the therapy with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib, are still fragmented. Here, we profile the spike-specific IgG and memory B-cell response in MF patients, treated or not with ruxolitinib, after the second and the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 (BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines. Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells samples were collected before vaccination, post the second and the third doses and tested for spike-specific antibodies, ACE2/RBD antibody inhibition binding activity and spike-specific B cells. The third vaccine dose significantly increased the spike-specific IgG titers in both ruxolitinib-treated and untreated patients, and strongly enhanced the percentage of subjects with antibodies capable of in vitro blocking ACE2/RBD interaction, from 50% up to 80%. While a very low frequency of spike-specific B cells was measured in blood 7 days after the second vaccination dose, a strong and significant increase was elicited by the third dose administration, generating a B cell response similar to the one detected in healthy controls. Despite the overall positive impact of the third dose in MF patients, two patients that were under active concomitant immunosuppressive treatment at the time of vaccination, and a patient that received lymphodepleting therapies in the past, remained low responders. The third mRNA vaccine dose strongly increases the SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and B cell responses in MF patients, promoting a reactivation of the immune response similar to the one observed in healthy controls.

Solid organ graft-versus-host disease in a recipient of a COVID-19 positive liver graft

A 66-year-old male with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), underwent deceased donor liver transplantation from a Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive donor. He presented a month later with fever, diarrhea and pancytopenia which led to hospitalization. The hospital course was notable for respiratory failure, attributed to invasive aspergillosis, as well as a diffuse rash. A bone marrow biopsy revealed hypocellular marrow without specific findings. In the following days, laboratory parameters raised concern for secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Clinical concern also grew for solid organ transplant graft-versus-host-disease (SOT-GVHD) based on repeat marrow biopsy with elevated donor-derived CD3+ T cells on chimerism. After, a multidisciplinary discussion, the patient was started on ruxolitinib, in addition to high dose steroids, to address both SOT-GVHD and secondary HLH. Patient developed symptoms concerning for hemorrhagic stroke and was transitioned to comfort care. Although GVHD has been studied extensively in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients, it is a rare entity in SOT with a lack of guidelines for management. Additionally, whether COVID-19 may play a role in development of SOT-GVDH has not been explored.Copyright © 2023 The Authors

Adjuvant Therapies of COVID-19-A Literature Review

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was originated first in Wuhan, Chi-na, in December 2019, and it is known to be caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coron-avirus-2 (SARS CoV-2). The management of COVID-19 could be achieved by means of the usage of the repurposed drugs, inhibiting the viral entry and/or viral fusion such as umifenovir, Barici-tinib, Camostat mesylate, Nafamostat mesylate, and the drugs blocking the viral replication, which include favipiravir, remdesivir, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Ribavirin, Sofosbuvir, chloroquine and Hydrox-ychloroquine. Objective(s): Along with the drugs that target the SARS-CoV-2 virus, adjunctive therapies are also employed. This review focuses on the adjuvant therapies employed to manage the COVID-19-asso-ciated complications, such as cytokine storm, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), respiratory failure, cardiac injury, coagulopathy, and multi-organ failure. Method(s): The literature was searched in databases such as Medline/PubMed Central/PubMed, Goo-gle Scholar, Science Direct, EBSCO, Scopus, EMBASE, Directory of open access journals (DOA-J), and reference lists to identify relevant articles. Result(s): Various studies have been identified for the use of corticosteroids, interferons, monoclon-al antibodies, etoposide, ruxolitinib, anticoagulants, convalescent plasma, immunoglobulins, mes-enchymal stem cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and inhaled nitric oxide (NO) as adjuvant therapy to manage the patients with COVID-19 along with the repurposed drugs targeting SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion(s): The safety and efficacy of adjuvant therapy are needed to be confirmed by various ongoing randomized controlled clinical trials.Copyright © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.

A Comprehensive Mini-review on COVID-19 Pathogenesis on Perspectives of Cytokine Storm and Recent Developments in Anti-Covid Nucleotide Analogues

The world has been rocked by the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which has significantly changed our way of life. Despite the unusual measures taken, COVID-19 still exists and affects people all over the world. A remarkable amount of study has been done to find ways to combat the infection's unsurpassed level. No ground-breaking antiviral agent has yet been introduced to remove COVID-19 and bring about a return to normalcy, even though numerous pharmaceuticals and therapeutic technologies have been reused and discovered. The cytokine storm phenomenon is of utmost importance since fatality is strongly connected with the severity of the disease. This severe inflammatory phenomenon marked by increased amounts of inflammatory mediators can be targeted for saving patients' life. Our analysis demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specifically generates a lot of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and results in lymphocyte exhaustion. Tocilizumab is an IL-6 inhibitor that is currently thought to be both generally safe and effective. Additionally, corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors could be effective and dependable methods to reduce cytokine-mediated storm in SARS-CoV-2 patients.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.

Late Worsening of COVID-19 Pneumonia: Successful Treatment with Ruxolitinib and Steroid.

We describe the case of a patient hospitalized for the second time in a month due to delayed worsening of lung lesions in COVID-19 infection without bacterial superinfection. He was treated with hydroxychloroquine, IV dexamethasone and ruxolitinib with rapid improvement of respiratory failure; 1 month after the second discharge, maintaining low-dose oral prednisone, lung consolidations were significantly reduced on control CT. LEARNING POINTS: Modulation of immune over-response in late phases of COVID-19 can influence global outcome.Ruxolitinib and IV steroids can reverse the inflammatory process and lung lesions.

Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Ph-neg chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: results from the EPICOVIDEHA registry.

Background: Patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) typically incur high rates of infections and both drugs and comorbidities may modulate infection risk. Objectives: The present study aims to assess the effect of immunosuppressive agents on clinical outcomes of MPN patients affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Design: This is an observational study. Methods: We specifically searched and analyzed MPN patients collected by EPICOVIDEHA online registry, which includes individuals with hematological malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 since February 2020. Results: Overall, 398 patients with MPN were observed for a median of 76 days [interquartile range (IQR): 19-197] after detection of SARS-CoV2 infection. Median age was 69 years (IQR: 58-77) and 183 individuals (46%) had myelofibrosis (MF). Overall, 121 patients (30%) of the whole cohort received immunosuppressive therapies including steroids, immunomodulatory drugs, or JAK inhibitors. Hospitalization and consecutive admission to intensive care unit was required in 216 (54%) and 53 patients (13%), respectively. Risk factors for hospital admission were identified by multivariable logistic regression and include exposure to immunosuppressive therapies [odds ratio (OR): 2.186; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.357-3.519], age ⩾70 years, and comorbidities. The fatality rate was 22% overall and the risk of death was independently increased by age ⩾70 years [hazard ratio (HR): 2.191; 95% CI: 1.363-3.521], previous comorbidities, and exposure to immunosuppressive therapies before the infection (HR: 2.143; 95% CI: 1.363-3.521). Conclusion: COVID-19 infection led to a particularly dismal outcome in MPN patients receiving immunosuppressive agents or reporting multiple comorbidities. Therefore, specific preventive strategies need to be tailored for such individuals. Plain language summary: EPICOVIDEHA registry reports inferior outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) incur high rates of infections during the course of their disease.The present study was aimed at assessing which patient characteristics predicted a worse outcome of SARS-COV-2 infection in individuals with MPN.To pursue this objective, the researchers analyzed the data collected by EPICOVIDEHA, an international online registry, which includes individuals with hematological malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 since February 2020.The database provided clinical data of 398 patients with MPN incurring COVID-19:Patients were mostly elderly (median age was 69 years);Forty-six percent of them were affected by myelofibrosis, which is the most severe MPN;Moreover, 32% were receiving immunosuppressive therapies (JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, steroids, or immunomodulatory IMID drugs, such as thalidomide) before COVID-19.Hospitalization was required in 54% of the patients, and the risk of being hospitalized for severe COVID-19 was independently predicted byOlder age;Comorbidities;Exposure to immunosuppressive therapies.Overall, 22% of MPN patients deceased soon after COVID-19 and the risk of death was independently increased over twofold byOlder age;Comorbidities;Exposure to immunosuppressive therapies before the infection.In conclusion, COVID-19 infection led to a particularly dismal outcome in MPN patients receiving immunosuppressive agents, including JAK inhibitors, or reporting multiple comorbidities. Therefore, specific preventive strategies need to be tailored for such individuals.

Ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy for treating autoimmune disorders and myeloproliferative neoplasms, their efficacy in treating other types of cancer has not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated oral ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily) with oral methylprednisolone (40 mg every other day) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease who had received a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, glucocorticosteroids and three or more prior regimens. All of the planned 29 patients had been enrolled with follow-up until 28 April 2022. Median lines of prior therapy were 6 (range 3-12). Cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization were evaluable in 28 patients; 9 (32%) and 17 (70%) patients showed high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q+, respectively. The overall response rate was 31%. The median duration of response was 13.1 (range 2.8-22.0) months. Median progression-free survival rate was 3.4 (range 0.5-24.6) months, Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The combination of ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone demonstrated significant clinical activity among previously heavily-treated MM patients, and responses were achieved among patients who had high-risk cytogenetics. This is the first clinical study to show activity of JAK inhibitors in combination with steroids for MM patients and expands the potential use of these drugs to those with cancers other than myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel ruxolitinib and baricitinib analogues for potential use against COVID-19.

The coronavirus pandemic known as COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, threatens public health worldwide. Approval of COVID-19 vaccines and antiviral drugs have greatly reduced the severe cases and mortality rate. However, the continuous mutations of viruses are challenging the efficacies of vaccines and antiviral drugs. A drug repurposing campaign has identified two JAK1/2 inhibitors ruxolitinib and baricitinib as potential antiviral drugs. Ruxolitinib and baricitinib exert dual antiviral effect by modulation of inflammatory response via JAK1/2 and inhibition of viral entry via AAK1 and GAK. Inspired by this, in an effort to diversify chemical space, three analogues ((R)-8, (S)-8, and 9) of ruxolitinib and baricitinb were made using a scaffold hopping strategy. Compound 9 displayed potent and comparable potencies against AAK1, JAK1, and JAK2 compared to baricitinib. Notably, compound 9 showed better selectivity for AAK1, JAK1, and JAK2 over GAK. Besides, compound 9 displayed good druglikeness according to Lipinski's and Veber's rule. We thereby identified a potential lead compound 9, which might be used for the further development of anti-coronaviral therapy.

Ruxolitinib on acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after modified donor lymphocyte infusion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of ruxolitinib on acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis and its impact on graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect in patients after modified donor lymphocyte infusion (mDLI). METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with relapsed leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) who received ruxolitinib prophylaxis between October 2018 and April 2020. The incidence of aGVHD, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were followed up for a median time of 8 months (range: 1-26 months). The incidence of aGVHD on Day 30 after mDLI was 41.2% and ranged from Grade 1 to 4; ten of 17 patients (58.8%) achieved a complete response (CR), and two (11.8%) had a partial response (PR). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation rate was 23.5%, and the median time from mDLI to CMV reactivation was 48.5 days. The mean DFS and OS after mDLI were 1.0 (95% CI 0.0-3.5) and 9.0 (95% CI 1.2-16.8) months, respectively. The causes of death for 10 patients were leukemia relapse (n = 5), aGVHD and septic shock (n = 3), intracranial lesion (n = 1), and COVID-19 (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: We reported encouraging results of ruxolitinib monotherapy in the prevention of aGVHD and maintenance of GVL for post-transplantation relapsed patients, even though being at high risk with poor initial prognosis.

Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: an opinion paper.

The precocity and efficacy of the vaccines developed so far against COVID-19 has been the most significant and saving advance against the pandemic. The development of vaccines has not prevented, during the whole period of the pandemic, the constant search for therapeutic medicines, both among existing drugs with different indications and in the development of new drugs. The Scientific Committee of the COVID-19 of the Illustrious College of Physicians of Madrid wanted to offer an early, simplified and critical approach to these new drugs, to new developments in immunotherapy and to what has been learned from the immune response modulators already known and which have proven effective against the virus, in order to help understand the current situation.

Possibilities of targeted therapy for myelofibrosis: Moscow experience

Background. for many years the primary aim of treatment strategy for ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms has been to restrain disease progression, with lasting relief and management of symptoms to improve patients' quality of life. Generally, this did not lead to a significant increase in life expectancy with primary myelofibrosis and didn't decrease the risk of fibrosis in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. To date a new class of targeted drugs has been developed, it is JAK2 inhibitors with pathogenetic effects. The results of clinical trials showed the high efficacy of the first registered drug of this its kind - ruxolitinib - that includes a faster reduction in the symptoms of tumor intoxication and in symptoms associated with the development of splenomegaly and increase in the overall survival rates. It is known that the data obtained during clinical trials of medicines may differ from the results obtained in routine clinical practice. In actual practice drugs are used in a much wider heterogeneous population of patients, less limited first of all by age and comorbid characteristics. It is possible to analyze cohorts of patients including a larger number of clinical cases with a longer follow-up period. In this regard of great interest is the actual clinical experience of long-term use of ruxolitinib in patients whose set is limited only by clinical contraindications for prescribing the drug. Aim. To present our own actual experience of targeted therapy of myelofibrosis and compare the results obtained with the data of clinical trials. Materials and methods. Our analysis includes data from 141 patients (67 (47.5 %) men and 74 (52.5 %) women) in a chronic phase myelofibrosis. All patients received ruxolitinib. Of these, 109 (69 %) patients had primary myelofibrosis, 26 (16 %) - postpolycythemia myelofibrosis, 6 (4 %) - postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. The median age at the start of therapy was 62 (18-84) years. The median disease duration before ruxolitinib was prescribed - 79 (1-401) months. According to the dIpSS (dynamic International prognostic Scoring System) criteria, 13 % of patients were assigned to the low risk group, 38 % - to the intermediate-1, 36 % - to the intermediate-2, 13 % - to the high risk group. Most patients (52 %) had grade 3 bone marrow fibrosis. Results. The median duration of treatment was 18 (range from 1 to 115) months. Symptoms of intoxication were relieved 74 (81 %) of 91 patients, the spleen size decreased in 81 % of patients (the spleen size returned to normal in 25 % of patients). The increase in the median hemoglobin level was 15 %. The proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion decreased by 4 times (from 39 to 9 %). Mean platelet levels normalized in most patients with baseline high and low platelet levels. A complete clinical and hematological response was achieved in 16 % (n = 23) of cases, a partial response - in 26 % (n = 37) of cases, clinical improvement - in 21 % (n = 30), disease stabilization - in 33 % (n = 46) of cases. No response was received in 1 (1 %) patient and in 3 (3 %) cases there was progression of the disease. At the time of analysis, 81 (57 %) of 141 patients were continuing the ruxolitinib treatment. The fatal outcome in 33 (22 %) patients was associated with concomitant diseases, among which 20 (14 %) died from proven COvId-19 infection. Overall survival: 1-year 81 %, 2-year 73 %, 5-year 50 %. Overall survival excluding deaths due to COvId-19: 1-year 92 %, 2-year 85 %, 5-year 70 %. Massive splenomegaly and a high degree of fibrosis were unfavorable predictors of prognosis of overall survival. Conclusion. Target therapy with Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib has demonstrated high efficacy in patients with myelofibrosis in routine clinical practice. The most rapid effect ruxolitinib had on the spleen size and the symptoms of intoxication. Tolerability of ruxolitinib therapy was generally satisfactory. The overall and progression-free survival rates in patients with myelofibrosis, receiving ruxolitinib i the clinical setting was consistent with the results of international multicenter clinical trials. Copyright © 2022 ABV-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.

COVID-19 and the potential of Janus family kinase (JAK) pathway inhibition: A novel treatment strategy.

Recent evidence proposed that the severity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients is a consequence of cytokine storm, characterized by increased IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, and IFN-γ. Hence, managing the cytokine storm by drugs has been suggested for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. Several of the proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 infection recruit a distinct intracellular signaling pathway mediated by JAKs. Consequently, JAK inhibitors, including baricitinib, pacritinib, ruxolitinib, and tofacitinib, may represent an effective therapeutic strategy for controlling the JAK to treat COVID-19. This study indicates the mechanism of cytokine storm and JAK/STAT pathway in COVID-19 as well as the medications used for JAK/STAT inhibitors.